Tuesday
Dec012009

Family Christmas Traditions

Let me set the scene for you. Three brothers and two parents in one car. None of us get along whatsoever. The tree farm my parents "fell in love with" is over two hours away. We get there on what is inevitably the coldest year on record, and trek around for two hours searching for a tree. Initially we find three, narrow that down to two in an hour and finally, as the daylight has gone, we decide on the perfect tree. It looks like every other tree.

Dad hands me the saw..or the rusty jalopy that stands in for a saw. And there I am…face down, ass up under a 14 foot tall douglas fir that I already hate. Covered in sap and needles, freezing what used to be my balls off. Of course, the tree is so thick nobody can hold it while I cut the son of a bitch down…and you just CAN'T get out of three feet of snow that quickly. So, not only do I get the honor of cutting down a tree, but I get the PRIVILEGE of dragging it a mile down a craggy hill side, in the snow, covered in what is the most hateful mix of water, shame, sap, and sharp pointy sabers masquerading as evergreen needles.

We purchase the tree, discover we forgot rope for the 10th year in a row, but $17 of rope (roughly 10 feet), strap the tree down to the roof of the car, and make our way home in the same manner we started…miserable and tired.

Let it be known that nobody's family is better than mine.

Friday
Aug072009

YAPPR- Yet Another Palm Pre Review

As many of you know, I am considering terminating my contract with AT&T to move over to the Sprint network and purchase a Palm Pre. I made my Pre purchase on Sunday, August 2 at 11pm. By Tuesday, I had my Pre in hand. Having had a few days to use the device, network, and sprint store customer service, I feel it's time for an initial review.

 

What this is

This will be a review of the Palm Pre hardware, Palm's new webOS, the Sprint network, and Sprint customer service. I will be as in-depth, specific, and un-biased as I can, and critical where I have had problems. I will also be making a comparison between the iPhone and Pre interface functions, which should help people get the idea of the paradigm each platform represents.

 

What this is not

This is not going to be a tit-for-tat between the iPhone and the Pre. Since comparing usability is a subjective matter, I will not be focusing energy on calling out what platform I feel does things right, and which one(s) don't. There is more than enough content online to help you decide what you like, and you can (and should) always stop by your nearest Sprint or Best Buy to compare several different smart phones for yourself.

 

Of Pre and Men

The Palm Pre seems to have been released as Palm's hail Mary play- a last ditch effort to retool, reorganize, and release a product that can save the company. How well it is working, and how long Palm can be sustained on the Pre has yet to be seen, and I think making early predictions would be a mistake. I don't think anybody could have seen how big the iPhone would be when Apple released the first generation, and in fact Apple, Inc. itself has been startled by our voracious appetite for smart devices.

Having said that, the underlying Operating System on the Palm Pre is known as webOS. Palm has developed webOS to be a very simple AJAX/HTML5 device that is easy to develop for if you have any web development experience. Since there seem to be an infinite number of web developers in the world, Palm seems to feel confident that this is the best choice.

As of yet, Palm has not released their Software Development Kit (SDK) to the general public, so there are few real-world experiences with development. We'll have to chalk this decision up as a "TBD". There does seem to be quite a bit of buzz in several internet forums, some of which already have "home brew" applications available for download and install. This is much like apps for Jailbroken iPhones- There is no official support, and Palm would prefer you use their distribution methods.

 

Body

The Palm Pre itself is a plastic body phone with a plastic screen and rubberized keyboard buttons. The phone's body slides open from bottom-to-top revealing a keyboard that extends the phone's dimensions by about 25%. When closed, the Pre is not as tall and not as wide as my iPhone, but it is thicker.

Official dimensions of the Pre are 2.3" wide, 3.9" high, and .67" thick. These numbers mean literally nothing without holding a phone in your hand. Sadly, every store in the world has their cell phones tethered with security cords, so you won't really be able to get a good feel for this unless you can hold an unbridled phone.

The device itself has a curved body and screen, which seems to lend itself very well to holding it in your hand and  single-thumb flicking. The curvature also helps the Pre disappear in your pocket, which is an added bonus. For those that carry a blackberry or iPhone in your pocket, you know how bulky it can feel. The Pre feels slightly better, though you will probably want it to be the only thing in your pocket still.

 

Keyboard

Several people, including myself, were concerned with the device's keyboard size. As we shrink smart phones smaller and smaller, it is clear that they keyboard will pay the ultimate price until it disappears completely. Apple is obviously the first one to recognize this fact, and they have made many non-believers change camps. For now, however, they keyboard on the Pre is absurdly small and yet somehow still functional. Each key is considerably smaller than a quarter of an inch, which means my little finger handily covers a minimum of four keys.

Even with such small keys, I can type "This is a test of how fast I can type on the palm pre. No caps. Don't judge." in 14 seconds, and only making two mistakes. First letter caps are handled by the phone, after any punctuation. Apostrophes are also placed into words where they belong automagically. So, 1 word per second for an average of 60 words per minute. This is far, FAR slower than I have become on the iPhone. Given time, I will become faster- I started at about a word every 20 seconds on Tuesday.

 

Screen

The Pre's screen measures 3.1" and has a resolution of 320 wide x 480 high. This is the same resolution the iPhone has, but in a screen that measures 0.4" smaller diagonally. This translates into sharper, but smaller images. For some, a smaller screen is not a plausible trade-off, so they probably won't enjoy the Pre. It isn't that the screen is noticeably smaller when using either device, but real estate is real estate.

So far, I have used the Pre in a dark room at night, direct sunlight, and literally every condition between. The brightness has always been high or low enough to comfortably view the screen, and when in direct sun there doesn't appear to be as much glare from the Pre screen when compared to the iPhone. I attribute this to the fact that  the Palm screen is curved, and the iPhone is simply flat glass.

Interestingly, the Pre screen feels a bit like the iPhone 3Gs- when you move your finger across the surface, there is very little resistance. One thing I have noticed, however, is that finger and face oil show up on the Pre's screen as though it were some kind of magnet. When looking directly at the screen, you don't notice the streaks and swipe marks, when when the device is off and you look at an angle...it's pretty bad.

As always, a screen protector is a requirement. I don't have one on my Pre just yet, and I haven't developed any scratches or blemishes on the screen or body, but every phone needs a screen protector. All of the major manufacturers have them available online and in stores, many of which are unbelievably inexpensive. I suggest invisiShield from Zagg.

 

Sound/Vibrate

The external speaker built into the Palm Pre has a good volume range without distortion, and can produce enough sound that it's almost too loud when turned all the way up. In a noisy environment, you will certainly hear your notification sounds...as long as they have some high pitch noises in them.

When enabled, the vibrate is actually pleasant. It's strong enough to be felt when the phone is in your pocket, but doesn't get carried away with the vibrate duration like a Nokia or and LG does. I've found that this reduces the number of "Phantom Vibrate" incidents to zero in my case, which is actually a nice thing. I enjoy not thinking my phone is ringing and I'm missing it.

Sound is, by far, one place that the Pre pulls away from the iPhone and many other competitive smart phones. Most of them do not focus on built-in sound, choosing instead to rely on headphones and Bluetooth headsets. This makes it impossible to share a Youtube video, to listen to a sound clip, or even use speaker phone in nearly any environment on anything but the Pre.

With regard to headphones, the Pre ships with earbuds like most other phones at this point. The buds themselves are decent quality- Certainly lower fidelity than my real headphones, higher than generic earbuds, and about on par with the iPod/iPhone earbuds. This is actually a relief to me, since the Apple earbuds are widely believed to be the best quality free earbuds that come with any device for consumers. If anything, I would say that the Pre earbuds produce a little more bass than the Apple ones, but I attribute this to them being smaller and therefore fitting into my ears better.

 

webOS

The webOS operating system introduces the concept of "cards", which are basically application windows. An application can have one or more cards, and one or more cards may be running at any given moment. To be clear, you can have multiple applications running at the same time on the Palm Pre. This is a huge departure from the iPhone and iPod Touch paradigm, where only one application is allowed to execute at a time.

In addition to cards, there is also a notifications area at the bottom of the screen. In an effort to not waste screen real estate, when there are no unchecked notifications, the area disappears. When a notification is present, the screen scales up about 1/4th of an inch, so no applications are hidden or obscured, and the notification is displayed. If the user ignores a notification, or interacts with an card in the main screen area, the notification area is shrunk to about 1/8th of an inch, and only an icon is displayed. Touching the notification area brings up the full sized notifications again. The user can touch a notification to open its corresponding application, or the notification can be "swiped" to the edge of the screen to permanently dismiss it.

For examples of these concepts, check out this Engadget Palm Pre UI demo video.

 

Gestures

In the new Palm webOS, we are reintroduced to an old favorite- Gestures. Palm has always tried to make life easier by assigning tasks to motions. Now, in 2009, instead of using gestures with a stylus, we simply swipe left, right, up and down with our fingers.

These motions activate several features within the webOS, most importantly the back gesture. Swiping your finger from right to left in the gesture area between the screen and button will cause your browser to go back a page, your application to go back a card, or a list of running cards to be shown for app selection. For example, if I am in the messaging application in an active conversation, and I swipe "back", I will be take back to my buddy / conversation list.

Also included in the gestures, are Cut/Copy/Paste features. Pressing the gesture area and X, C, or V will activate each function just like your computer! While this does require two-handed operation, I don't find that to be a problem as the Pre and iPhone really need two hands for any real typing anyway.

 

Applications

As of now, there are few applications available from the Palm apps program. As I previously mentioned, Palm has yet to officially unveil their SDK, so there aren't many sanctioned application developers. There are "homebrew" apps, and enabling them is far easier than jailbreaking an iPhone.

What applications do exist are quite well done, including the "homebrew" ones. Several big names have received early copies of the webOS SDK, which has allowed them to release a small number of helpful things. So far there is a weather app, Fandango for movies, Where and LikeME as well as a few other apps for finding local attractions and activities, a game or two, and a Twitter client.

When developers are officially allowed to write apps for the webOS, it seem there will be an influx of several hundred immediately. I don't know if Palm has any kind of approval or quality check process for apps, but if they do it should be easier than Apple apps since nothing is turned into code that can't be read by people.

There is talk of an actual Apple-like development kit, which would allow programmers to write faster apps that don't use web technologies. These apps would presumably be more powerful, allow access to more phone features, and run quicker. There is no guarantee of this, however, and thus far there aren't many features a current app can't use. This is going to have to remain a "TBD" as well.

 

Pitfalls

Just like the iPhone, changing some of the notification sounds is not an option. This is complete rubbish, and both Palm and Apple need to change this policy immediately. There isn't much more to discuss with this one- Offering a phone without features found in 1996 is unforgivable.

The text selection speed could be doubled. As of now, you have to swipe quite a few times to select a full line of text. This makes selection awkward and unpredictable. Granted, it is more stable than selecting text on the iPhone, it's still only half way there. Make the selector move half the distance my finger moves, and I'll be happy.

When playing music, there is no "scrubber" that would allow you to fast-forward or reverse through a song. On the iPhone, a scrubber appears during certain types of playback, but on the Pre it simply doesn't exist. The one good thing here is that Palm can simply issue an update over the air for that one component, and pretend they never made this massive mistake. Apple has to update the whole phone, which requires it ti be plugged in and sync'd first.

 

Giant leaps for mankind

The number one game changing feature on the Palm Pre is the automatic backup. When you first configure your phone, you are asked to create a Palm profile. This profile is a place where all your installed Apps, App data, Phone settings, and on-phone contacts are stored. You can back up your phone manually with the Backup app, or you can allow your phone to do it automatically for you on a daily basis. Never again do you have to worry about which contacts you've lost when your phone dies.

Also of huge note is the concept of "synergy". No, not the marketing buzz word. Palm Synergy allows you to have your Google, Outlook, and Palm contacts all appear on your phone. At the same time. And most impressive, when you have duplicate contacts, it merges them into one listing on the phone. It will take details from each contact source, and display them all in one item on the phone! So, if I have you as a work contact, and your cell phone number in my Google contacts list, on my phone it will be noted that I have your cell number in Google and the rest in Exchange!

This feature also works with chat contacts. When I open the messaging application, I can choose to associate your IM screen name with your Contact information, which will then allow me to change between text messaging and IM in a single conversation with you. Simply put, this feature is astonishing.

 

Conclusion

So, the Palm Pre is a phone built with me in mind. I use multiple apps on my computer, and I do the same on my Pre. I have contacts spread all around my online world, and the Pre keeps track of them all for me. Most importantly, the Pre focuses on me the user and making my life simpler. I don't need another distraction in my day- I already have Facebook, Twitter, News feeds, Youtube, and countless pictures people send me of cats in insane poses.

This is the end of the first part of my review. Next, I will review my support incidents with Sprint, and the network coverage. These will be significantly shorter, and there simply isn't as much to cover.

Tuesday
Jul282009

Double blind RF test

Lately, the news has been full of pseudo-scientific articles about health scares, ailments, disease causing technology, and plain 'ol bullshit. Recently, several news sources picked up a completely bunk story about radio frequency (RF) sensitivity in about 2% of the world's population. But RF sensitivity is a complete sham, with literally no data to back up a patient's claims- Much like chronic fatigue syndrome.

The reason for the following test scenario can be found in an article here on Ars Technica. It seems this week, several news outlets picked up a completely fabricated story and ran with it before having anyone confirm or research the subject. My opinion of journalistic integrity isn't what this post is about, though, so that's for another day.

There is a need to put certain claims to bed once and for all, and the best way to do that is a double-blind test. A test in which neither the subject nor the administrator knows anything that could give them an advantage or disadvantage in any way. For more information on double-blind tests, I suggest reading this Wikipedia article. For now, though, it's on with my concept.

 

Overview

This test consists of several required components- The test administrator, the test taker, an RF generator, a console with a single button, a computer to control the RF output frequency and power, and random data from http://www.random.org.

By using a single button to trigger the test condition, neither the administrator nor the subject has any influence on the other person, or the test itself. No visual or audio cues can be provided by the administrator if they don't have to adjust controls or view output from the test device.

Random data sourced from RANDOM.org has been calculated to be random to a degree far higher than a human brain can acheive. This data is collected through atmospheric noise, processed with several algorithms to assure randomness, and then provided online for the general public. Using this data will prevent a bias for or against the participants, which will provide better results in the end.

 

Phase 1

During phase one, the test taker will be deciding whether the RF device is on or off. The test data from RANDOM.org will simply be a stream of random binary 0 or 1, which will turn the RF device full off or full on. The test administrator will confirm the subject is ready, press the button on the test console, note the subject's answer, and release the button.

 

Phase 2

During phase two, the data received from RANDOM.org will be a sequence of random numbers from 0 to 250. These numbers will control the power output of the RF generator, from 0 to 250 mW. This will give an EIRP (Effective Isotropic Radiated Power) equivalent to that of most WiFi access points, and at close range should be more than enough to be detected.

The test administrator will confirm the subject is ready and press a button on the test console. The button will tell the control computer to choose the next random number in the sequence, and will command the RF generator to output a signal with the given strength. The administrator will note the participant's answer, and release the button.

 

Conclusion

When all tests have been concluded, the original random data will be made available on the computer console for comparison to the test taker's choices. Phase two should confirm any results seen during phase one- If phase one is passed with better-than-chance results, phase two should show a correlation between radiated power and the subject's perception.

Monday
Jul132009

Something Funny

I just learned that in order to install the Exchange management tools on a Workstation with Active Directoy Users and Computers on it, you need to install the Windows SMTP service. This in itself is odd and makes me worry, but the oddities don't stop there. Nope. Not even close.

To satisfy the requirements for the Windows SMTP service installation, you also need to install the World Wide Web service (http server), and the Internet Information Services Snap-In. The latter is obvious- Installing the Web server without any way to manage it would be bizarre. But, the fact that the SMTP service REQUIRES a web server is plain stupid!

Good server or workstation management would dictate that the fewer unnecessary services you have installed, the fewer security holes you will have to watch for. And we all know full well that Microsoft's http server is lousy with security problems when it hasn't been installed and maintained properly.

Now, if I want to manage my users' email properties from my workstation, I have to install all of this extra software that is filled with vulnerabilities and potential honey pots for SPAM bots on a network. When you consider this is a management workstation, that's a pretty scary scenario! My PC has fewer checks against it by our security devices, simply by nature of my job! Now, I'm second guessing if just logging into a server every time I need to make a change isn't a bad idea.

Either way, smarten up Microsoft. Seriously. Installing a web server on a mail server is a retarded idea in the first place. And just to make it all worse, the fact that I need to do all of this on a system that shouldn't have EITHER on it...that's unforgivable.

Monday
Jun152009

MacBook Pro 13" Review

Some of my friends have asked that I post a review of my thoughts regarding the new Uni-body 13" MacBook Pro. Most of you know I despise most things Apple, including their hardware, software, and culture-of-Mac.

 

So, why bother with a MacBook?

First and foremost, I like small laptops. A 13" laptop is the perfect combination of size and functionality for me- I don't need a massive screen for most of what I do, but I do need to be able to grab-and-go when work or life calls. I already own a Dell XPS1330, which I will be keeping. I love that machine, and it's been worth every penny I spent on it. But, when Apple announced a uni-body 13" laptop, I had to try it.

The new MacBook Pro systems are made out of a single block of aluminum, which is machined and milled down to the shape and size required. What is left over is easily recyclable, since aluminum is one of the few materials that recycles 100%. Plastic doesn't do that. Not only is the source material more responsible to use, but the battery, circuit boards, screens, glass, and few remaining plastic pieces are all made in more responsible ways. Note, I said MORE RESPONSIBLE WAYS, not environmentally friendly ways. All of these materials require VAST amounts of energy to produce, and cause unbelievable pollution beyond carbon dioxide release. I suspect their next move will be corn or soy based plastics and foams, which have come a very long way in the past two or three years, and require a smaller carbon and pollution footprint to produce.

The second reason I wanted a 13" MacBook Pro is less "hippy". This particular system is the least expensive of the MacBook Pro lineup- a product line that provides more "advanced" options than the standard MacBook line. I an going to be developing software for the iPhone, which requires an OS X system to run the development and testing tools I need. To me, this is complete crap on the side of Apple, but it doesn't surprise me in the least. The Apple culture is about Apple, not the users. You do things their way, or you don't do them at all. But, enough rambling, let's get to the meat and potatoes!

 

Unboxing

The unit itself came wrapped in a thin plastic bag, which held a box that held the laptop, cords and disks. All of these were either contained in other cardboard packaging, or had plastic wrappers on them. I know twist ties confuse Mac users like a plastic bag on a dog's head, but I think we can simple get rid of all this unnecessary garbage. It will all hopefully end up in a recycling plant, but the fact of the matter is that producing, shipping, and recycling costs money, energy, and frankly, time. And even given how easy it is to recycle, many people still don't do it. So, just stop wrapping these things completely!

Aside from the unnecessary boxes, dividers, wrappers, and protective sleeves, the unit itself is packed solidly within its box. There is no risk of the computer sliding around within the box, which is a good thing. I've received many systems that had crushed their packaging and slammed around the inside of a shipping box, which is obviously not a good thing. The computer itself also comes with a plastic sleeve over it to prevent scratches to the aluminum body. This fact actually worries me- how well will the body stand up to the test of time and constant usage?

Once you have everything unwrapped and ready to plug in, you will notice a foam protective piece slid between the keyboard and the screen. This is for shipping purposes, and most manufacturers take this simple measure to prevent keys from scratching your screen during shipping. I will make this request here and now- STOP. I've carried laptops for YEARS as my primary machine, and I've seen several hundred of them used in business and personal situations. NONE of them have ever had the keyboard scratch the screen. We don't need the foam divider.

 

Hardware

The first thing I did to my MacBook Pro, before even turning the power on, was upgrade my RAM. I ordered the computer with 2GB, and wanted 4GB. Apple, in typical OEM fashion overcharges for their RAM. But, unlike Dell, HP, or IBM, they don't just charge a few percent more than market value. They charge several TIMES more. This is unforgivable to me, and is a clear sign that they are trying to milk "power" users that know more RAM is more valuable to the usability of a computer. Moreover, even offering a laptop with less than 4GB of RAM in 2009 is foolish- ESPECIALLY when your entire operating system is 64bit. Drop the 2GB offering, and bump the base model up to 4GB. Your low end users may not utilize the new memory to its fullest, but the operating system itself will be more responsive than they are used to. This is a bonus for everyone!

When I opened the body, there were 10 #0 screws on the bottom side of the system. These sized screws are pretty standard from all manufacturers, so everything is good so far. Immediately I noticed the screws took a little more force to remove than I would normally be comfortable with. This turned out to be due to the Loc-Tite used on the screws during assembly in China. I think this is a wise choice, and ALL manufacturers should move to using some kind of thread-locking fluid during assembly. Over time, screws will break free and start backing themselves out of every laptop. This is what causes those creaks when you pick up your laptop from the table. Simply using a thread locking fluid reduces the risk of this happening, which increases longevity of the laptop.

Inside the extremely chintzy feeling bottom panel is where your RAM, hard drive, DVD drive, and battery lay. All of them are easy to get to, and none of them require an Apple certified specialist (I refuse to call them Geniuses) to remove or replace. Simply find your nearest computer geek, and they will EASILY be able to service your computer. But, Apple sees things differently, and they will void your warranty if you have someone else replace the battery for you. With regard to the other hardware, I don't know what their policy is, so I won't suggest you test it. I suspect my off-brand RAM will annoy them, but then I won't be taking it in for service unless something drastic happens.

The remaining hardware is pretty generic, mass produced components. All laptop vendors use the same few brands of disk drive, DVD drive, RAM, and other peripherals. In addition, the system's main board is filled with Intel reference components and generic parts. Nothing shocking here, so we'll move right along.

 

Software

I have used Mac OS X in the past on a few different machines. All of the ones I have owned were older generation hardware, so the operating system and software I would run were unbearably slow. Apple addressed this issue a long while ago by moving to the Intel CPU architecture, and they have clearly been happy with the results. As of now, OS X is a snappy operating system to use. Beyond OS X's speed, however, lies one of my least favorite "features" of the entire Mac culture- non-standardization.

OS X refuses to force developers to implement certain standard ways of doing certain things. An example would be the buttons on the top of every window. These buttons SEEM to have a standard use in every application- Close, Minimize, and "Make Bigger". However, implementing these buttons is actually left to the developer to do. Moreover, the "Make Bigger" button has no standard implementation like Maximize on EVERY OTHER OPERATING SYSTEM IN EXISTENCE! This button in particular sends me over the edge- why even offer it if it doesn't make the current window take up all of the real estate on the screen?!

My final rant regarding the OS X operating system (for now) is the perceived simplicity. An Apple PC is easy to use because there isn't very much to it. Options for power users are non-existent, or hidden in such a painful directory structure that you'll ignore them. This doesn't denote simplicity, by the way. This is Apple making it hard for you to change the way your computer works. Apple is the on-paper communism of the computer world. It seems wonderful and almost utopian, until you try to individualize. It's then that you notice the total dominance they have over your computing experience. And this strangle hold extends to all of their devices and software, from the iPhone to the Apple TV. You WILL use their product in the manner prescribed, or you will be punished.

 

Setup

Once you turn on your computer, Apple displays some welcome information, and guides you through the setup process. Note, however, there is no way to skip the stupid "Welcome" video that is played. You can only mute it. The actual setup process is very quick and painless. Total time is maybe 5 minutes for someone reading every screen. An important note is that you MUST fill out the personally identifiable information, and the "Where will you primarily use this computer" and "What best describes what you do" fields. To me, this is a bit annoying, because I know they are mining this data. It doesn't really gain them anything special, but it's just one more bit of data they are collecting.

 

Conclusion

I don't think an Apple PC is the right choice for me. I do recognize, however, that people should use the right tool for the right job. If your Mom and Dad want a simple PC that will get them on the internet for email and web browsing, then a Mac may be the way to go. Then again, it may not. There is always the choice of "Other".

I still FIRMLY stand behind Ubuntu as my Operating System of choice, especially for computer novices! Software comes from trusted sources that are verified, which lessens the chance of installing a piece of badware. This is the new threat in computers today, and Apple has proven they are taking the same long road that Microsoft took- security by secrecy. I feel this is the wrong choice for them, but again I'm not surprised in any way.

I do look forward to learning a third computer platform, so I can offer help to those that may need it. Apple charges quite a bit for support, when most of my friends and family get it for free. So, who knows. Maybe in a year I'll like the system but hate the company. Anything is possible when Tom buys a Mac!!